Details for: An argument on the inutility of the distinction between barrister, and attorney. Addressed to the Lord Chancellor. By William Lockey Harle.

An argument on the inutility of the distinction between barrister, and attorney. Addressed to the Lord Chancellor. By William Lockey Harle.

.Publisher: London : V. & R. Stevens and G.S. Norton, 1851Description: 31, [1]p.Subject(s): Lawyers -- Great Britain

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Collection	Class number	Copy number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Reference material	House of Lords Library - Palace Truro Corridor, First Floor	Truro	PAM VOL.25(9) (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Not for loan		32595-1001

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	PAM VOL.25(6) The ballot for benchers. By a Templar.	PAM VOL.25(7) A letter to the Lord Chancellor, on the subject of circuit leagues. By Charles Rann Kennedy.	PAM VOL.25(8) A letter to the Vice-Chancellor of England upon his resolution to abolish the practice of adjourning his court by reason of the absence of leading counsel. By Charles Purton Cooper ...	PAM VOL.25(9) An argument on the inutility of the distinction between barrister, and attorney. Addressed to the Lord Chancellor. By William Lockey Harle.	PAM VOL.2(6) The subject-matter of letters patents for inventions, and registration of designs, with the statutes and cases relating to the copyright of designs and the provisional protection of inventions, &c. &c., &c., /	PAM VOL.26(1) Precedency of His Royal Highness Prince Albert, King-consort, de jure, of Great Britain and Ireland.	PAM VOL.26(2) The precedence question.	Next