Asia's latent nuclear powers : Japan, South Korea and Taiwan / Mark Fitzpatrick.
Series: Adelphi (Series) (International Institute for Strategic Studies): 455.Publisher: Abingdon : Routledge for the International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2016Description: 175 pages.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9781138930803.ISSN: 1944-5571.Subject(s): Nuclear nonproliferation -- Japan | Nuclear nonproliferation -- Korea (South) | Nuclear nonproliferation -- TaiwanSummary: Under what conditions would the democracies in Northeast Asia seek to join the nuclear weapons club? Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are threshold nuclear powers by virtue of their robust civilian nuclear-energy programmes. All three once pursued nuclear weapons and all face nuclear-armed adversaries. Fitzpatrick's latest book analyses these past nuclear pursuits and current proliferation drivers. It considers how long it would take each to build a nuclear weapon if such a fateful decision were made but does not predict such a scenario. Unlike when each previously went down a nuclear path, democracy and a free press now prevail as barriers to building bombs in the basement. Reliance on US defence commitments is a better security alternative--as long as such guarantees remain credible. But extended deterrence is not a barrier to proliferation of sensitive nuclear technologies. Nuclear hedging by its Northeast Asian partners will challenge Washington's nuclear diplomacy.Item type | Current library | Collection | Class number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Book | Offsite Offsite Deepstore | Pamphlets | PAM 2016/046 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 013057 |
Under what conditions would the democracies in Northeast Asia seek to join the nuclear weapons club? Japan, South Korea and Taiwan are threshold nuclear powers by virtue of their robust civilian nuclear-energy programmes. All three once pursued nuclear weapons and all face nuclear-armed adversaries. Fitzpatrick's latest book analyses these past nuclear pursuits and current proliferation drivers. It considers how long it would take each to build a nuclear weapon if such a fateful decision were made but does not predict such a scenario. Unlike when each previously went down a nuclear path, democracy and a free press now prevail as barriers to building bombs in the basement. Reliance on US defence commitments is a better security alternative--as long as such guarantees remain credible. But extended deterrence is not a barrier to proliferation of sensitive nuclear technologies. Nuclear hedging by its Northeast Asian partners will challenge Washington's nuclear diplomacy.