THIS IS THE TEST SERVER CATALOGUE IT WILL NOT BE UP-TO-DATE
 visit the Parliament website.

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

No miracles : the failure of Soviet decision-making in the Afghan war / Michael R. Fenzel.

By: Fenzel, Michael R [author.].Publisher: Stanford, California : Stanford Security Studies, an imprint of Stanford University Press, 2017Description: x, 180 pages.Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9780804798181; 9780804799102.Subject(s): T︠S︡K KPSS. Politbi︠u︡ro -- Decision making | Afghanistan -- History -- Soviet occupation, 1979-1989 | Soviet Union -- Military policy -- Decision makingDDC classification: 958.1045
Contents:
1. Introduction -- 2. The Soviet failure in Afghanistan -- 3. Setting the stage : evolution of party-military relations -- 4. Getting in : Leonid Brezhnev and the Soviet decision to invade Afghanistan -- 5. No retreat ... no miracles : Brezhnev, Andropov and Chernenko in Afghanistan (1980-1985) -- 6. Gorbachev's quest for "reluctant, silent agreement" to withdraw from Afghanistan -- 7. Getting out : Gorbachev and the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan (1986-1989) -- 8. Losing Afghanistan.
Summary: "The Soviet experience in Afghanistan provides a compelling perspective on the far-reaching hazards of military intervention. In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev decided that a withdrawal from Afghanistan should occur as soon as possible. The Soviet Union's senior leadership had become aware that their strategy was unraveling, their operational and tactical methods were not working, and the sacrifices they were demanding from the Soviet people and military were unlikely to produce the forecasted results. Despite this state of affairs, operations in Afghanistan persisted and four more years passed before the Soviets finally withdrew their military forces. In No Miracles, Michael Fenzel explains why and how that happened, as viewed from the center of the Soviet state. From that perspective, three sources of failure stand out: poor civil-military relations, repeated and rapid turnover of Soviet leadership, and the perception that Soviet global prestige and influence were inexorably tied to the success of the Afghan mission. Fenzel enumerates the series of misperceptions and misjudgments that led to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, tracing the hazards of their military intervention and occupation. Ultimately, he offers a cautionary tale to nation states and policymakers considering military intervention and the use of force." -- Taken from back cover.
Holdings
Item type Current library Class number Copy number Status Date due Barcode
Book House of Lords Library - Palace Dewey 958.1045 FRE (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 014811

1. Introduction -- 2. The Soviet failure in Afghanistan -- 3. Setting the stage : evolution of party-military relations -- 4. Getting in : Leonid Brezhnev and the Soviet decision to invade Afghanistan -- 5. No retreat ... no miracles : Brezhnev, Andropov and Chernenko in Afghanistan (1980-1985) -- 6. Gorbachev's quest for "reluctant, silent agreement" to withdraw from Afghanistan -- 7. Getting out : Gorbachev and the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan (1986-1989) -- 8. Losing Afghanistan.

"The Soviet experience in Afghanistan provides a compelling perspective on the far-reaching hazards of military intervention. In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev decided that a withdrawal from Afghanistan should occur as soon as possible. The Soviet Union's senior leadership had become aware that their strategy was unraveling, their operational and tactical methods were not working, and the sacrifices they were demanding from the Soviet people and military were unlikely to produce the forecasted results. Despite this state of affairs, operations in Afghanistan persisted and four more years passed before the Soviets finally withdrew their military forces.

In No Miracles, Michael Fenzel explains why and how that happened, as viewed from the center of the Soviet state. From that perspective, three sources of failure stand out: poor civil-military relations, repeated and rapid turnover of Soviet leadership, and the perception that Soviet global prestige and influence were inexorably tied to the success of the Afghan mission. Fenzel enumerates the series of misperceptions and misjudgments that led to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, tracing the hazards of their military intervention and occupation. Ultimately, he offers a cautionary tale to nation states and policymakers considering military intervention and the use of force." -- Taken from back cover.

Contact us

Phone: 0207 219 5242
Email: hllibrary@parliament.uk
Website: lordslibrary.parliament.uk

Accessibility statement