THIS IS THE TEST SERVER CATALOGUE IT WILL NOT BE UP-TO-DATE
 visit the Parliament website.

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Justifying strict liability : a comparative analysis in legal reasoning / Marco Cappelletti.

By: Cappelletti, Marco, 1986- [author.].Series: Oxford scholarship online: Publisher: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2023Description: 1 online resource.Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9780191953170.Subject(s): Strict liability -- England | Strict liability -- United States | Strict liability -- France | Strict liability -- Italy | Law -- Methodology | Comparative law | Law | Laws of specific jurisdictions & specific areas of lawAdditional Physical Form: Print version : 9780192859860DDC classification: 346.038 Online resources: Oxford Academic Summary: The imposition of strict liability in tort law is controversial, and its theoretical foundations are the object of vigorous debate. Why do or should we impose strict liability on employers for the torts committed by their employees, or on a person for the harm caused by their children, animals, activities, or things? In responding to this type of questions, legal actors rely on a wide variety of justifications. This book explores, in a comparative perspective, the most significant arguments that are put forward to justify the imposition of strict liability in four legal systems, two common law, England and the United States, and two civil law, France and Italy.
Holdings
Item type Current library Copy number Status
ebook House of Lords Library - Palace Online access 1 Available

Also issued in print: 2022.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

The imposition of strict liability in tort law is controversial, and its theoretical foundations are the object of vigorous debate. Why do or should we impose strict liability on employers for the torts committed by their employees, or on a person for the harm caused by their children, animals, activities, or things? In responding to this type of questions, legal actors rely on a wide variety of justifications. This book explores, in a comparative perspective, the most significant arguments that are put forward to justify the imposition of strict liability in four legal systems, two common law, England and the United States, and two civil law, France and Italy.

Specialized.

Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (viewed on February 2, 2023).

Contact us

Phone: 0207 219 5242
Email: hllibrary@parliament.uk
Website: lordslibrary.parliament.uk

Accessibility statement